My favorite is the articulation theory. I have never heard of it until now. To think that I have spent years accepting the chaos, the uncomfortable feeling from fragmentation, deconstruction and postmodernism. Suddenly this articulation theory comes to the picture and I felt like I could breathe just a bit. It’s funny how articulation seems to also deconstructing the deconstruction. Where is this present in the literature I studied? I want to read more about it.

Well, I’m just disappointed I haven’t heard about it before I read this article.

As I was reading this article, I predicted proceeding paragraphs. It was a really weird experience while reading an academic article. Has this happened to anyone else? It seems like this article covers some of the same stuff.

As I read, I thought postmodernists could do fair use a lot of good, and poof there it was in the text.

“The articulation theory provides a way for thinking about how meaning is constructed contingently from pieces of other meanings and social forces.”
So this is why they call words moving words, I’m guessing. But is articulation trying to come up with stabilizing definitions or definitions that last?
And I said this before, but Im glad Eilola agrees that it is incredibly hard to come up with an original idea.
Is a symbolic analyst someone like Joseph Campbell, the star wars guy?
This is some great material.
I’ve identified with the authors in lots of ways.