<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discussing Moberly&#8217;s &#8220;Composition, Computer Games, and the Absence of Writing&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engl516.stevendkrause.com/2010/03/16/discussing-moberlys-composition-computer-games-and-the-absence-of-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engl516.stevendkrause.com/2010/03/16/discussing-moberlys-composition-computer-games-and-the-absence-of-writing/</link>
	<description>Prof. Steven D. Krause &#124; Eastern Michigan University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian R.</title>
		<link>http://engl516.stevendkrause.com/2010/03/16/discussing-moberlys-composition-computer-games-and-the-absence-of-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-2650</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engl516.stevendkrause.com/?p=755#comment-2650</guid>
		<description>Dave, I&#039;m actually not sure yet how much time we need to spend teaching actual writing to get students to write better.  I know that sounds odd, but there seems to be evidence to support the idea that the more time we give students to think about writing on their own the better they write.  I&#039;m kind of hooked on the WWV approach we talked about last week.  I think something like that could really work in a FYC class too, if balanced the correct way.  There are a lot of things to work out of course, but I would definitely be persuaded to try something similar for a semester to see how it works.  A lot of what I wrote here is really vague and needs to really be thought through more specifically, but in general I think there is a learning connection between writing and working with other modes that might be really powerful in FYC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I&#8217;m actually not sure yet how much time we need to spend teaching actual writing to get students to write better.  I know that sounds odd, but there seems to be evidence to support the idea that the more time we give students to think about writing on their own the better they write.  I&#8217;m kind of hooked on the WWV approach we talked about last week.  I think something like that could really work in a FYC class too, if balanced the correct way.  There are a lot of things to work out of course, but I would definitely be persuaded to try something similar for a semester to see how it works.  A lot of what I wrote here is really vague and needs to really be thought through more specifically, but in general I think there is a learning connection between writing and working with other modes that might be really powerful in FYC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

